These research notes are provided as-is and contain supplementary working research.

Finding

C(ii)'s household stopped because his children were dying, not because he left

The younger Berkhamsted John was opened as a candidate on a departure-shaped gap in the record, and that gap does not exist. His household's last baptism is Francis in 1636/7; within the following two years the parish buried Joane (November 1637), Richard (June 1638), William (October 1638), Elizabeth (February 1638/9) and Francis (March 1638/9), and two of those are demonstrably his own children. A household that loses four or five members in eighteen months and then stops appearing in the baptism register is displaying mortality, not departure. The finding matters beyond this candidate: a departure-shaped gap is only evidence where the burial series for the same parish and window has been read and shown to be covered.

Confidence: Moderate-high

Why this conclusion

Qualifications and conflicts

Sources

Appears in

  • John Gurney identity case file — Section 8.2, 'Why C(ii) does not rise higher: his household stopped because his children were dying, not because he left.'

Topic file location: Identity — Berkhamsted: Candidates C(i) and C(ii)

Relationship map

Technical details
  • Research item: G13-RI-000213
  • Graph revision: 381
  • Machine-readable JSON: /assets/g13-graph/findings/G13-RI-000213.json

This is one research item from the John Gurney research graph; the fuller narrative treatment is in the linked topic above and the research library.