These research notes are provided as-is and contain supplementary working research.

Negative result

Negative: FamilySearch full-text sweep surfaces no new John Gurney colony document

A FamilySearch full-text search across the Massachusetts Bay colony-records films and the Massachusetts State Archives (Felt) colonial-period volumes surfaced no John Gurney document beyond the two already known (the 1641 gunpowder-fine calendar and the 1644 bill). The residual '+Braintree +meadowes' images resolve to the 1664 will of James Penniman and the 1689/90 will of Richard Brackett, neither naming a Gurney. Manuscript-level searching thus adds no record to the printed footprint.

Confidence: Moderate-high

Search scope

  • Searched: FamilySearch Full-Text Search — Massachusetts Bay colony-records films and Massachusetts State Archives (Felt) colonial-period volumes; Suffolk probate and deed images
  • Coverage window: 1636 to 1699
  • Search: +Gurny/+Gurney/+Gurnie/+Girny variant probes with +Braintree/+Weymouth/+meadowes/+petition token anchors across the colony-records and Felt-volume films.
  • Results reviewed: 0
  • Limitations: 17th-century manuscript petition text does not OCR searchably; the 1646 Braintree petition's own text returns zero, so a null full-text result is a manuscript-index negative, not a full manuscript negative.; Felt volumes are reachable through calendar/index pages rather than searchable body text.

Why this conclusion

Sources

Topic file location: Colonial record coverage

Relationship map

Technical details
  • Research item: G13-RI-000182
  • Graph revision: 244
  • Machine-readable JSON: /assets/g13-graph/findings/G13-RI-000182.json

This is one research item from the John Gurney research graph; the fuller narrative treatment is in the linked topic above and the research library.