These research notes are provided as-is and contain supplementary working research.
This page expands an Evidence link in Identity — the shape, the matrix, and the two families: the findings, sources, and qualifications behind the marked passage.
Analysis
Eight corrections to the shape, and a ninth rule from the elimination side
The shape as first specified needed eight corrections, in descending order of how much each changes a score. Margaret belongs on the mother axis as a substantial soft hit. The Mary attribute has a primary bound and the Richard and John attributes do not - Mary Gurney married Daniel Shed at Braintree in 1647, so at a minimum marriage age of sixteen she was born by 1631, while Richard about 1630 and John about 1633 rest entirely on compiled estimates with no primary record behind them; this matters directly, because Hitcham's Mary of January 1630/1 satisfies the primary bound exactly while looking three years off the traditional date. The two marriage attributes are mutually exclusive, so scoring both double-counts one marriage. The paternal-grandfather attribute is a derived prediction rather than an independent observation, conditional on Richard being the eldest son, so a hit on it is a hit on a hypothesis and a miss is weak evidence. A departure attribute should be added - the household's records stop between 1635 and 1641 with no burial or probate for the head - but only with its coverage control attached, since two false departure gaps have already been produced by omitting it, and on a properly controlled test only Ackworth currently passes. A penalty is needed for children with no colonial counterpart, since as specified the shape can only reward matches and never penalise surplus. The surname attribute is a weighted scale rather than a single tick. And Peter, Isaac and Sarah must be excluded from scoring rather than treated as missing children, because their absence from English registers is expected. A ninth rule arrived from the elimination side: three undated role-row households, one of them earlier described as the single most important loose end in the work, were dated on a second instrument and resolved to 1687, 1704 and 1710 - so an undated role row is not evidence of an in-window household until it is dated elsewhere.
Why this conclusion
- Depends on Finding Name variants are a weighted scale attaching to the record, never a class of surnames to excludeThe correction making the surname attribute a weighted scale rests on the variant rule.
Qualifications and conflicts
- Qualifies Analysis The fifteen-attribute shape: one specification every candidate is scored againstEight corrections restate the specification the matrix scores against.
Sources
- Bodge, George Madison. Soldiers in King Philip's War: Containing Lists of the Soldiers of Massachusetts Colony, Who Served in the Indian War of 1675-1677, with Sketches of the Principal Officers, and Copies of Ancient Documents and Records Relating to the War. Boston: Printed for the Author, 1891., p. 114, 'Peeter Gurnay', Weymouth, Dedham muster 10 December 1675
- Braintree (Mass.). Records of the Town of Braintree, 1640 to 1793. Edited by Samuel A. Bates. Randolph, Mass.: D. H. Huxford, printer, 1886., Mary Gurney's marriage to Daniel Shed at Braintree, 1647
- FamilySearch Full-Text Search, AI-transcribed manuscript image collections (deeds, probate, parish and borough records)., Plymouth Colony court order of 1 March 1663/4 naming Isaac
- FindMyPast county-level parish index sets — Norfolk, Essex, Northamptonshire, Oxfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Middlesex, Westminster, Berkshire, Herefordshire, Sussex, Warwickshire, Yorkshire and Bedfordshire baptisms, with Norfolk, Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire and Westminster marriages and banns. Authenticated sessions, 29 July and 1 August 2026; retained transcript records from Norfolk, Cambridgeshire, Westminster, Berkshire, Essex, Northamptonshire, Middlesex and Bedfordshire., Sussex Baptisms, Herefordshire Baptisms and Warwickshire Baptisms single-dataset runs of 29 July 2026, dating the three role-row households to Horsham 1704, Stoke Lacy 1687 and Coleshill 1710
- Findmypast UK Parish Baptisms aggregated dataset within Birth, Marriage, Death and Parish Records., No Peter Gurney-variant baptism in Great Britain 1627-1647 and no Isaac 1632-1652, across all parish-baptism collections wildcarded over the Gurney surname family
- Chamberlain, George Walter, and Channing Harris Cox, comps. History of Weymouth, Massachusetts. 4 vols. Published by the Weymouth Historical Society (Howard H. Joy, President), under direction of the town. Weymouth, Mass.: Weymouth Historical Society, 1923. Vol. 3 carries the Genealogy of Weymouth families (John Gurney Sr. and Richard Gurney entries)., vol. 3, p. 251
- Sprague, Waldo Chamberlain. Genealogies of the Families of Braintree, Mass., 1640–1850. Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001., p. 695
- Torrey, Clarence Almon. New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2004. Page 331, Gurney entries. Accessed via Ancestry.com, U.S., New England Marriages Prior to 1700 (Provo, UT: Ancestry.com Operations Inc., 2012), database collection 3824., The same marriage; and the absence of any Sarah Gurney of this family
Appears in
- John Gurney identity case file — Section 1's note following the fact table carries two of the corrections: Peter and Isaac as American-born and Sarah as doubtful on her own account.
Topic file location: Identity — the shape, the matrix, and the two families
Also covered here
Technical details
- Evidence marker:
G13-PM-000129 - Primary research item:
G13-RI-000227 - Graph revision:
381 - Machine-readable JSON:
/assets/g13-graph/marker-bundles/G13-PM-000129.json