These research notes are provided as-is and contain supplementary working research.

This page expands an Evidence link in Origin — trade and training: the findings, sources, and qualifications behind the marked passage.

Negative result

No John Gurney in the Norwich freemen or apprentice registers

The Norwich city freemen register (Millican, 1548-1713) and the enrolled Norwich apprentice-indenture index (Rising & Millican, NRS 29) record no John Gurney freedom admission and no enrolled apprenticeship in the colonial-emigrant window, c.1615-1660. The registers' Gurney content is otherwise Elizabethan (a John Gurney freed not by apprenticeship in 1560/61; a John Gurney cordwainer dead by 1580) plus a single seventeenth-century entry - James Gurney, son of Francis of St Peter Parmentergate, bound at Michaelmas 1627 for seven years and admitted freeman under Henry Bond in January 1648 - which is a Norwich-side record of a Francis Gurney household, not the emigrant. The East Anglian formal trade-transmission pathway thus carries no record of John's training.

Confidence: Moderate-high

Search scope

  • Searched: Percy Millican, Register of the Freemen of Norwich 1548-1713 (1934); Winifred M. Rising & Percy Millican, Index of Indentures of Norwich Apprentices, Norfolk Record Society vol.29 (1959) — Norwich city freemen register and enrolled apprentice-indenture index
  • Coverage window: 1615 to 1660
  • Search: Gurney-variant search of both published Norwich corporate registers for any John Gurney freedom admission or enrolled apprenticeship in the emigrant window.
  • Results reviewed: 6
  • Limitations: Only enrolled indentures and admitted freedoms are captured; a Norwich youth trained by a master who never enrolled the indenture, or who never took up the city freedom, would not appear.; The only seventeenth-century Gurney is James, son of Francis of St Peter Parmentergate (bound 1627, freed 1648) - a Norwich-side witness supporting the two-Francis separation, not the emigrant John.; OCR and index coverage of the published registers is imperfect and the counts are a floor; a page-level scan of the emigrant admission window (c.1620-41, ff.170-180) is still outstanding as belt-and-braces confirmation.

Why this conclusion

Sources

Topic file location: Origin — trade and training

Technical details
  • Evidence marker: G13-PM-000046
  • Primary research item: G13-RI-000073
  • Graph revision: 244
  • Machine-readable JSON: /assets/g13-graph/marker-bundles/G13-PM-000046.json